Current:Home > ScamsNorthern Ireland prosecutor says UK soldiers involved in Bloody Sunday won’t face perjury charges -Capitatum
Northern Ireland prosecutor says UK soldiers involved in Bloody Sunday won’t face perjury charges
View
Date:2025-04-16 11:38:16
LONDON (AP) — Fifteen British soldiers who allegedly lied to an inquiry into Bloody Sunday, one of the deadliest days of the decades-long Northern Ireland conflict, will not face perjury charges, prosecutors said Friday.
There was insufficient evidence to convict the soldiers or a former alleged member of the Irish Republican Army about their testimony before an inquiry into the 1972 killings of 13 civilians by Britain’s Parachute Regiment in Derry, also known as Londonderry, the Public Prosecution Service said.
An initial investigation into the slayings on Jan. 30, 1972 concluded the soldiers were defending themselves from a mob of IRA bombers and gunmen. But a 12-year-long inquiry concluded in 2010 that soldiers unjustifiably opened fire on unarmed and fleeing civilians and then lied about it for decades.
Families of the victims were outraged by the decision. John Kelly, whose brother Michael was killed by paratroopers, spoke for the group and called it an “affront to the rule of law.”
“Why is it that the people of Derry cannot forget the events of Bloody Sunday, yet the Parachute Regiment, who caused all of the deaths and injury on that day, apparently cannot recall it?” Kelly said. “The answer to this question is quite simple but painfully obvious: The British Army lied its way through the conflict in the north.”
Although a quarter century has passed since the Good Friday peace accord in 1998 largely put to rest three decades of violence involving Irish republican and British loyalist militants and U.K. soldiers, “the Troubles″ still reverberate. Some 3,600 people were killed — most in Northern Ireland, though the IRA also set off bombs in England.
Only one ex-paratrooper from Bloody Sunday, known as Soldier F, faces prosecution for two murders and five attempted murders. He was among the 15 soldiers who could have faced a perjury charge.
While victims continue to seek justice for past carnage, the possibility of a criminal prosecution could soon vanish.
The British government passed a Legacy and Reconciliation Bill last year that would have given immunity from prosecution for most offenses by militant groups and British soldiers after May 1. But a Belfast judge ruled in February that the bill does not comply with human rights law. The government is appealing the ruling.
Attorney Ciaran Shiels, who represents some of the Bloody Sunday families, said they would not rule out further legal action.
“It is of course regrettable that this decision has been communicated to us only today, some 14 years after the inquiry’s unequivocal findings, but less than two weeks before the effective enactment date of the morally bankrupt legacy legislation designed specifically to allow British Army veterans to escape justice for its criminal actions in the north of Ireland,” Shiels said.
Senior Public Prosecutor John O’Neill said the decision not to bring criminal charges was based on three things: accounts given by soldiers in 1972 were not admissible; much of the evidence the inquiry relied on is not available today; and the inquiry’s conclusion that testimony was false did not always meet the criminal standard of proof.
“I wish to make clear that these decisions not to prosecute in no way undermine the findings of the Bloody Sunday Inquiry that those killed or injured were not posing a threat to any of the soldiers,” O’Neill said.
veryGood! (949)
Related
- Mega Millions winning numbers for August 6 drawing: Jackpot climbs to $398 million
- 60 dancers who fled the war now take the stage — as The United Ukrainian Ballet
- 'A Room With a View' actor Julian Sands is missing after he went on a hike
- 'El Juicio' detalla el régimen de terror de la dictadura argentina 1976-'83
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- Want to understand the U.S.? This historian says the South holds the key
- The list of nominations for 2023 Oscars
- This is your bear on drugs: Going wild with 'Cocaine Bear'
- FBI: California woman brought sword, whip and other weapons into Capitol during Jan. 6 riot
- We love-love 'Poker Face', P-P-'Poker Face'
Ranking
- Selena Gomez engaged to Benny Blanco after 1 year together: 'Forever begins now'
- New graphic novel explores the life of 'Queenie,' Harlem Renaissance mob boss
- Getting therapeutic with 'Shrinking'
- We royally wade into the Harry and Meghan discourse
- Paige Bueckers vs. Hannah Hidalgo highlights women's basketball games to watch
- M3GAN, murder, and mass queer appeal
- 'The Daily Show' guest hosts (so far): Why Leslie Jones soared and D.L. Hughley sank
- Ke Huy Quan wins Oscar for best supporting actor for 'Everything Everywhere'
Recommendation
NCAA President Charlie Baker would be 'shocked' if women's tournament revenue units isn't passed
30 years after the siege, 'Waco' examines what led to the catastrophe
'Shrinking' gets great work from a great cast
'Wait Wait' for Feb. 11, 2023: With Not My Job guest Geena Davis
Report: Lauri Markkanen signs 5-year, $238 million extension with Utah Jazz
He watched the Koons 'balloon dog' fall and shatter ... and wants to buy the remains
Phil McGraw, America's TV shrink, plans to end 'Dr. Phil' after 21 seasons
How Stokely Carmichael and the Black Panthers changed the civil rights movement